4.8 Article

Facile and efficient encapsulation of antimicrobial peptides via crosslinked DNA nanostructures and their application in wound therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 313, 期 -, 页码 120-130

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.10.013

关键词

DNA hydrogel; S. aureus infection; Wound healing; Antimicrobial peptides; Controlled release; Electrostatic interactions

资金

  1. National University of Singapore [R148000200112, R148000240114]
  2. Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund [R148000200112, R148000240114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is growing interest in the development of nucleic acid nanostructures as smart functional materials for applications in drug delivery. Inspired by the diverse physical interactions that exist in nature, crosslinked DNA nanostructures can serve as attractive affinity binding networks that interact with therapeutic cargos or living cells. Herein we report a strategy that addresses the challenges of topical oligopeptide therapy by exploiting high binding affinity between polyanionic DNA nanostructures and cationic antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to fabricate hydrogels that release a model antimicrobial L12 peptide in response to pathogenic S. aureus infections. We further demonstrated controlled peptide release profiles via the DNA hydrogels that were biocompatible and delivered superior antimicrobial activity against nuclease-releasing susceptible and methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections. Single application of the L12-loaded DNA hydrogels on porcine explant S. aureus infections revealed potent efficacy after 24 h. As a result of the capacity of the crosslinked DNA nanostructures to elicit a strong anti-inflammatory response, in vivo treatment of mice excision wounds translated into faster healing rates. Overall, the crosslinked DNA nanostructures reported in this study offer significant advantage as functional wound dressings and their future adaptation holds equally great promise for the delivery of cationic antimicrobials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据