4.5 Article

Experimental investigation on steel-tube-confined-concrete stub column with different cross-section shapes under uniaxial-compression

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2019.105729

关键词

Steel tube confined concrete columns; Octagonal cross-section shape; High strength concrete; Confinement; Cross-section resistance; Design method

资金

  1. Construction Industry Council under the project Application of Polygonal High Strength Concrete-filled Composite Column in Seismic-resistant Buildings in Hong Kong
  2. Chinese National Engineering Research Centre for Steel Construction (Hong Kong Branch) at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An experimental investigation on steel tube confined concrete (STCC) stub columns with circular, square and octagonal cross-section shapes under monotonic axial compression was conducted. Different concrete grades were examined with measured compressive cylinder strengths ranging from 38 MPa to 112 MPa. The nominal yield strength of the steel tube was 355 MPa. The load capacity, load-axial shortening curves and axial-hoop strain behaviour of the STCC stub columns are compared to that of the counterparts, concrete filled steel tubes (CFST), with different cross-section shapes based on the same material and geometric properties. Comparisons indicated that the load capacity of STCC stub columns are very close to that in the CFST with circular and octagonal cross-sections, while the performance of square STCC is not as good as the CFST counterparts due to low effectiveness of confinement. According to the experimental results of lateral behaviours of STCC, CFST and plain concrete columns, it was concluded that with very high strength concrete (cylinder strength over 100 MPa), the axial performance of STCC stub columns is better than that in CFST. A design assessment was also conducted on STCC stub columns and shows that the current design formulae for load capacity of CFST are also applicable to that of STCC stub columns. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据