4.7 Article

Bio-templated 3D porous graphitic carbon nitride hybrid aerogel with enhanced charge carrier separation for efficient removal of hazardous organic pollutants

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 556, 期 -, 页码 366-375

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.072

关键词

g-C3N4 hybrid aerogel; Photodegradation; Organic pollutants

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0600204]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670592]
  3. Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar of Heilongjiang Province [JQ2019C001]
  4. Central University Basic Scientific Research Project of China [2572017EB03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) hybrid aerogels (GHAs) with different proportions of g-C3N4 were prepared using g-C3N4, carboxymethyl cellulose, and beta-cyclodextrin. GHAs have demonstrated high porosity, large specific surface area, rich three-dimensional network structure. GHAs demonstrated an excellent synergistic effect on the photocatalytic and adsorptive properties. Especially, GHA1 (the ratio of g-C3N4 and aerogel component was 1:1) exhibited a good synergy in photodegradation and adsorption, with a Rhodamine B (Rh B) removal up to 97.99% in 90 min. In five cycling experiments, the GHA1 showed a good long-term stability. The aerogels can be easily isolated and maintains its excellent photocatalytic properties. Compared to pure g-C3N4, GHA1 has a stronger photocurrent, which is due to the transmission of light to the surface of the catalyst, promoted photo-generated electron-hole pairs, and inhibited recombination of electros and holes. Finally, mechanistic studies reveal that the superoxide radicals (O-center dot(2-)) are the main active groups in the photocatalytic degradation process. This work provides a useful perspective in design and fabrication of hybrid aerogel composites with an enhanced photocatalytic activity. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据