4.7 Article

Cloning, characterization and anion inhibition studies of a γ-carbonic anhydrase from the Antarctic bacterium Colwellia psychrerythraea

期刊

BIOORGANIC & MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 24, 期 4, 页码 835-840

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.01.005

关键词

Carbonic anhydrase; Metalloenzymes; Inhibitors; Anions; Psychrophiles; Hydratase activity; Antarctic carbonic anhydrase; Cold adaptation; Cold-enzymes

资金

  1. Italian National Antarctic Research Project PNRA [2013/AZ1.02]
  2. vice deanship of research chairs of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  3. Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program (DSFP) of King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have cloned, purified and characterized the gamma-carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1) present in the genome of the Antarctic bacterium Colwellia psychrerythraea, which is an obligate psychrophile. The enzyme shows a significant catalytic activity for the physiologic reaction of CO2 hydration to bicarbonate and protons, with the following kinetic parameters: k(cat) of 6.0 x 10(5) s(-1) and a k(cat)/K-m of 4.7 x 10(6) M-1 x s(-1). This activitywas inhibited by the sulfonamide CA inhibitor (CAI) acetazolamide, with a K-I of 502 nM. A range of anions was also investigated for their inhibitory action against the new enzyme CpsCA. Perchlorate, tetrafluoroborate, fluoride and bromide were not inhibitory, whereas cyanate, thiocyanate, cyanide, hydrogensulfide, carbonate and bicarbonate showed K(I)s in the range of 1.4-4.4 mM. Diethyldithiocarbamate was a better inhibitor (K-I of 0.58 mM) whereas sulfamide, sulfamate, phenylboronic acid and phenylarsonic acid were the most effective inhibitors detected, with K(I)s ranging between 8 and 38 mu M. The present study may shed some more light regarding the role that gamma-CAs play in the life cycle of psychrophilic bacteria as the Antarctic one investigated here. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据