4.7 Article

Direct preparation of efficient catalyst for oxygen evolution reaction and high-purity Li2CO3 from spent LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.051

关键词

Waste lithium ion batteries; Mechanochemical activation; Li2CO3 recovery

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0403300/2017YFB0403305]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51425405, 51874269]
  3. 1000 Talents Program of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recovery of waste lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) is an intensively studied worldwide because of environmental pollution and the risk of undersupply of a strategic raw material. Traditional technologies have poor selectivity for lithium recovery from waste LIBs. Metallic Ni, Co, and Mn are usually recovered by leaching, precipitation, and solvent extraction. These recycling methods are costly and have a long recycling route and high potential for secondary waste generation. In this paper, a mechanochemical activation approach was proposed for the selective recycling of lithium and recovery of Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2(OH)(2) from spent LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 batteries. The leaching efficiency and Li selectivity were found to be 95.10% and 100%, respectively. The structure of Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2(OH)(2) was investigated using various characterisation techniques. The selective reaction mechanism of mechanochemical activation was identified. High-purity Li2CO3 (99.96 wt%) was obtained. Electrochemical tests showed that the performance of Ni0.5Mn0.3Co0.2(OH)(2) was comparable to that of a commercial oxygen evolution reaction catalyst (IrO2). This research demonstrates an effective and shorter route from waste to a functional material during recycling spent LIBs that incorporates the principles of green chemistry and shows great potential for practical application. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据