4.7 Article

Source apportionment of heavy metals in farmland soil of Wuwei, China: Comparison of three receptor models

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 237, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117792

关键词

Farmland soil heavy metals; Source apportionment; GPCA/APCS; PMF; UNMIX

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41671188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Receptor models are, rarely utilized in soil but are often used to identify pollutant sources and quantify their contribution. This paper focuses on the soil in oasis farmland. A geochemical baseline is used to assess the pollution of the soil, and then three models are tentatively utilized to apportion heavy metals and compare the sources, the contributions and the operation effects. Pollution assessment indicated that the farmland soil of Wuwei was lightly contaminated by heavy metals. Source apportionments suggested that atmospheric deposition contributed the most pollution (53.95%-65.35%). The three models supplemented each other, and the grouped principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores (GPCA/APCS) was outstanding. GPCA/APCS and UNMIX suggested that agricultural activities were the prime anthropogenic source (51.06%-61.56%), followed by the combustion of fossil fuels (coal and oil) (27.92%-28.66%) and building materials-related activities source (10.52%-20.29%). Fertilizers and pesticides (67.88%-74.81%) contributed more than traffic emissions (25.19%-32.12%) in agricultural activities. Similar results were acquired via positive matrix factorization (PMF), while industrial activity was the highest individual contributor (29.91%). Therefore, combining these three models was the most effective approach, and more attention should be paid to mitigating the pollution caused by the use of fertilizers and pesticides as well as the industrial activities in Wuwei. The results of this study could provide reference in reduction of heavy metal pollution in farmland soil. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据