4.4 Article

Antiplatelet and Antithrombotic Effects of the Extract of Lindera obtusiloba Leaves

期刊

BIOMOLECULES & THERAPEUTICS
卷 24, 期 6, 页码 659-664

出版社

KOREAN SOC APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY
DOI: 10.4062/biomolther.2016.021

关键词

Lindera obtusiloba; Platelet aggregation; Thrombosis; Thromboxane

资金

  1. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE)
  2. Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT) through Promoting Regional Specialized Industry [R0002418]
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Republic of Korea [R0002418] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lindera obtusiloba has been used in traditional herbal medicine for the treatment of blood stasis and inflammation. The leaves of Lindera obtusiloba have been reported to exhibit various physiological activities. However, there is little information available on their antiplatelet and antithrombotic activities. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of Lindera obtusiloba leaf extract (LLE) on platelet activities, coagulation and thromboembolism. In a platelet aggregation study, LLE significantly inhibited various agonist-induced platelet aggregations in vitro and ex vivo. Furthermore, LLE significantly inhibited collagen-induced thromboxane A2 (TXA2) production in rat platelets. In addition, oral administration of LLE was protective in a mouse model of pulmonary thromboembolism induced by intravenous injection of a mixture of collagen and epinephrine. Interestingly, LLE did not significantly alter prothrombin time (PT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). This study indicates that the antithrombotic effects of LLE might be due to its antiplatelet activities rather than anticoagulation. Taken together, these results suggest that LLE may be a candidate preventive and therapeutic agent in cardiovascular diseases associated with platelet hyperactivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据