4.6 Article

A comprehensive study of pomegranate flowers polyphenols and metabolites in rat biological samples by high-performance liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1604, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460472

关键词

Punica granatum L. flowers; Polyphenols; Ellagitannin; Metabolism; HPLC-Q-TOF-MS2

资金

  1. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-STS-QYZD-066]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pomegranate flowers is an ancient medicine that has commonly been used to treat various diseases such as diabetes. However, no reports are available on the metabolic profile of pomegranate flowers in vivo. In the present study, with the aid of HPLC-Q-TOF-MS2, 67 compounds were identified in pomegranate flowers extract, including 18 ellagitannins, 14 gallic acid and galloyl derivatives, five anthocyanins and 18 flavonoids. Seven compounds were firstly identified. In vivo, 22 absorbed compounds and 35 metabolites were identified in rat biosamples (urine, feces, plasma and tissues) after orally administered with pomegranate flowers extract. This result showed that not all compounds abundant in pomegranate flowers extract could be absorbed well in plasma and tissues. This finding also suggested a potential correlation between study on metabolic profile of these compounds in vivo and study on strategy of screening bioactivity of the isolates with in vitro cell systems evaluation. Notably, mono-glucuronide conjugated metabolite of ellagitannin compound (corilagin) was firstly identified. In addition, this is first report to identify phase II conjugate metabolites of ellagitannins in vivo after oral administration of ellagitanninsrich extracts (or foods). Thus, characterizing its multiple constitution, absorption and metabolic fate of these compounds in vivo is helpful to better analyze the active components in pomegranate flowers. (C) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据