4.5 Article

Within-person analysis of developmental cascades between externalising and internalising problems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
卷 61, 期 6, 页码 681-688

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.13150

关键词

Externalising disorder; internalising disorder; comorbidity; developmental psychopathology; longitudinal studies

资金

  1. Jacobs Foundation [2010-888]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [100013_116829, 100014_132124]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [100014_132124] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In a large body of previous research, cross-lagged panel models (CLPMs) have been used to provide empirical support for developmental models that posit a cascade from externalising-to-internalising problems. These developmental models, however, arguably refer to within-person processes whereas CLPMs provide a difficult-to-interpret blend of within- and between- person effects. Methods We used autoregressive latent trajectory models with structured residuals (ALT-SR) to evaluate whether there is evidence for externalising-to-internalising cascades at the within-person level when disaggregating between- and within- person effects. We used eight waves of data (age 7-15) from the Zurich Project on Social Development from Childhood to Adulthood (z-proso). Results ALT-SR fit better than the corresponding CLPMs. Using an ALT-SR, we found evidence for externalising-to-internalising cascades, consistent with previous CLPM studies. However, we also found some evidence for effects in the ALT-SR that were not apparent in the CLPM, including a negative effect of externalising on internalising problems in adolescence. In addition, a negative effect of internalising on externalising problems in adolescence was found in both the CLPM and ALT-SR. Conclusions Within-person results were largely consistent with previous evidence from CLPMs; however, at the within-person level, externalising and internalising may negatively influence one another in adolescence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据