4.7 Article

Inhibition of microRNA-150-5p alleviates cardiac inflammation and fibrosis via targeting Smad7 in high glucose-treated cardiac fibroblasts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 235, 期 11, 页码 7769-7779

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.29386

关键词

diabetic cardiomyopath; fibrosis; inflammation; microRNA-150-5p; TGF-beta 1; Smad

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M621308]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2017108]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81600935, 81770809]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hyperglycemia-induced cardiac fibrosis is a prominent characteristic of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Changes in proinflammatory cytokines have been shown to lead to cardiac fibrosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. This study aimed to investigate the role of miR-150-5p in mediating cardiac inflammation and fibrosis in cardiac fibroblasts (CFs). Herein, we found that high-glucose (HG) treatment significantly induced cardiac inflammation, as manifested by increased proinflammatory cytokine production (IL-1 beta) and NF-kappa B activity in CFs. Moreover, HG markedly aggravated cardiac fibrosis and increased levels of fibrotic markers (CTGF, FN, alpha-SMA) and extracellular matrix proteins (Col-I, Col-III) in CFs. At the same time, HG disturbed the TGF-beta 1/Smad signaling pathway, as evidenced by increases in TGF-beta 1 and p-Smad2/3 levels and decreases in Smad7 levels in CFs. Furthermore, we found that miR-150-5p was upregulated by HG, which negatively regulated Smad7 expression at the posttranscription level. Further study demonstrated that cardiac inflammation and fibrosis in CFs were corrected following miR-150-5p knockdown, but exacerbated by miR-150-5p overexpression. These data indicated that miR-150-5p inhibition could ameliorate NF-kappa B-related inflammation and TGF-beta 1/Smad-induced cardiac fibrosis through targeting Smad7. Thus, miR-150-5p may be a novel promising target for treating diabetic cardiomyopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据