4.8 Article

Insight into synergetic mechanism of Au@Pd and oxygen vacancy sites for coupling light-driven H2O oxidation and CO2 reduction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CATALYSIS
卷 378, 期 -, 页码 164-175

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcat.2019.08.031

关键词

Solar-driven CO2 reduction; Au@Pd nanoparticles; Oxygen vacancy; CO2 center dot-; Active hydrogen

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0301601]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BHYC1701B, XK1802-6]
  4. PetroChina Science and Technology Management Department [2016E-0703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O into CH4 is a promising way to realize solar energy utilization and CO2 conversion, in which the key issue is how to enhance and couple CO2 reduction as well as H2O oxidation. In this work, we precisely fabricated a binary functional photocatalyst by loading Au@Pd nanoparticles onto Vo-rich TiO2 through a surfactant-free deposition-reduction method, whose fine structure was confirmed by aberration-corrected HAADF-STEM, EELS, EPR and XPS. Combining photocatalytic performance with a series of in situ FTIR measurements, we clarified the role of metallic sites and semiconductor support in coupling CO2 reduction and H2O oxidation. Specifically, H2O oxidation process was facilitated by the Vo-rich TiO2 to contribute more protons, followed by the activation of CO2 and protons primarily by the metallic Au@Pd sites to form the surface bounded Au@Pd-CO2 center dot- and Au@Pd-H species. By adjusting the ratio of Au@Pd nanoparticles and V-O concentration to manipulate the Au@Pd-C-2(center dot-)/Au@Pd-H ratio, CH4 yield of 26.32 mu mol/(g.h) and selectivity of electron toward CH4 of 96% can be observed with minimal concomitant H-2 generation. These findings could open a feasible and universal route to enhance the photocatalytic efficiency of CO2 conversion. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据