4.6 Article

On the mechanism of GIRK2 channel gating by phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate, sodium, and the G?? dimer

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 294, 期 49, 页码 18934-18948

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010047

关键词

phosphoinositide; G protein; gating; potassium channel; molecular dynamics; molecular modeling; membrane protein; allosteric regulation; transmembrane domain; channel activation; G?? dimer; GIRK2 channel; intracellular Na+; molecular dynamics simulations; PIP2

资金

  1. Foundation of Fujian Educational Committee [JA13236]
  2. Xiamen University of Technology [E201300100]
  3. National Institutes of Health [NIH R01 HL059949-22]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

G protein?gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channels belong to the inward-rectifier K+ (Kir) family, are abundantly expressed in the heart and the brain, and require that phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate is present so that intracellular channel-gating regulators such as G?? and Na+ ions can maintain the channel-open state. However, despite high-resolution structures (GIRK2) and a large number of functional studies, we do not have a coherent picture of how G?? and Na+ ions control gating of GIRK2 channels. Here, we utilized computational modeling and all-atom microsecond-scale molecular dynamics simulations to determine which gates are controlled by Na+ and G?? and how each regulator uses the channel domain movements to control gate transitions. We found that Na+ ions control the cytosolic gate of the channel through an anti-clockwise rotation, whereas G?? stabilizes the transmembrane gate in the open state through a rocking movement of the cytosolic domain. Both effects alter the way in which the channel interacts with phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate and thereby stabilizes the open states of the respective gates. These studies of GIRK channel dynamics present for the first time a comprehensive structural model that is consistent with the great body of literature on GIRK channel function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据