4.5 Article

A Generalized Abundance Index for Seasonal Invertebrates

期刊

BIOMETRICS
卷 72, 期 4, 页码 1305-1314

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/biom.12506

关键词

Butterflies; Citizen science; Concentrated likelihood; Normal mixtures; Phenology; UKBMS

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/1000917/1, EP/P505577/1]
  2. Countryside Council for Wales
  3. Defra
  4. Joint Nature Conservation Committee
  5. Forestry Commission
  6. Natural England
  7. Natural Environment Research Council
  8. Northern Ireland Environment Agency
  9. Scottish Natural Heritage
  10. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At a time of climate change and major loss of biodiversity, it is important to have efficient tools for monitoring populations. In this context, animal abundance indices play an important role. In producing indices for invertebrates, it is important to account for variation in counts within seasons. Two new methods for describing seasonal variation in invertebrate counts have recently been proposed; one is nonparametric, using generalized additive models, and the other is parametric, based on stopover models. We present a novel generalized abundance index which encompasses both parametric and nonparametric approaches. It is extremely efficient to compute this index due to the use of concentrated likelihood techniques. This has particular relevance for the analysis of data from long-term extensive monitoring schemes with records for many species and sites, for which existing modeling techniques can be prohibitively time consuming. Performance of the index is demonstrated by several applications to UK Butterfly Monitoring Scheme data. We demonstrate the potential for new insights into both phenology and spatial variation in seasonal patterns from parametric modeling and the incorporation of covariate dependence, which is relevant for both monitoring and conservation. Associated R code is available on the journal website.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据