4.2 Article

Medication adherence in patients with asthma using once-daily versus twice-daily ICS/LABAs

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASTHMA
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 102-111

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1663429

关键词

Dry powder inhaler; medication persistence; fluticasone; vilanterol; budesonide; formoterol; salmeterol; dosing frequency

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) [208604/HO-17-18885]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared medication adherence and persistence among asthma patients receiving different ICS/LABA treatments. Results showed higher medication adherence with FF/VI compared to B/F or FP/SAL. Patients using FF/VI also had longer persistence with the index medication.
Objective: This real-world observational study compared medication adherence and persistence among patients with asthma receiving the once-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ?(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus the twice-daily ICS/LABAs budesonide/formoterol (B/F) and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL). Methods: This retrospective cohort study conducted using IQVIA (TM) Health Plan Claims Data included patients with asthma ?18?years of age initiating ICS/LABA therapy with FF/VI, B/F, or FP/SAL between January 1, 2014 and June 30, 2016 (index date). Patients had ?12?months and ?3?months of continuous eligibility pre- and post-index date, respectively. Patients receiving FF/VI were separately matched 1:1 with patients receiving B/F or FP/SAL using propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable regression to balance baseline covariates between cohorts. The primary endpoint was medication adherence, measured by proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints included proportion of patients achieving PDC???0.5 and PDC???0.8 and persistence with index medication, measured by time to discontinuation (>45-day gap in therapy). Results: After PSM, 3,764 and 3,339 patients receiving FF/VI were matched with patients receiving B/F or FP/SAL, respectively. Mean PDC was significantly higher for FF/VI versus B/F (0.453 vs 0.345; adjusted p?

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据