4.6 Article

Influence of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone and methacrylic acid on thermal curing process of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate hydrogel

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 137, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.48622

关键词

Biomedical Applications; Hydrophilic Polymers; Swelling; Radical Polymerization; Copolymers

资金

  1. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF, Korea) [JA180036]
  2. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST), Republic of Korea [JA180036] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (NVP) and methacrylic acid (MA) comonomers on the curing characteristics and properties of poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) hydrogel for soft contact lenses. A real-time temperature measurement system was devised and the exothermic behaviors of hydrogel contact lenses comprising PHEMA, P(HEMA/NVP), and P(HEMA/MA) during oven-curing condition were analyzed. The results of the real-time temperature measurement were compared with the experimental analysis by using differential scanning calorimetry at different heating rates. NVP and MA content changes affected the HEMA-based hydrogel's equilibrium water content (EWC), contact lens diameter, and gel fraction. HEMA-based hydrogel sheets with varying NVP and MA contents were fabricated and mechanically characterized. The temperature at which the exothermic reaction occurred varied depending on the type of added comonomer and the exothermic reaction of HEMA containing NVP was delayed. When NVP was added, the mechanical strength and EWC were lower than when MA was added. In order to maintain the mechanical properties while improving the equilibrium moisture content of the lens, it was found that the use of MA is more advantageous than the use of NVP. (c) Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019, 137, 48622.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据