4.5 Article

Optimizing Machine Learning Methods to Improve Predictive Models of Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 71, 期 3, 页码 1027-1036

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-190262

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; classification; early diagnosis; machine learning; magnetic resonance imaging; mild cognitive impairment; predictive analytics

资金

  1. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health) [U01AG024904]
  2. DOD ADNI (Department of Defense) [W81XWH-12-2-0012]
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
  5. AbbVie
  6. Alzheimer's Association
  7. Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation
  8. Araclon Biotech
  9. BioClinica, Inc.
  10. Biogen
  11. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company
  12. CereSpir, Inc.
  13. Cogstate
  14. Eisai Inc.
  15. Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  16. Eli Lilly and Company
  17. EuroImmun
  18. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.
  19. Fujirebio
  20. GE Healthcare
  21. IXICO Ltd.
  22. Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.
  23. Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.
  24. Lumosity
  25. Lundbeck
  26. Merck Co., Inc.
  27. Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.
  28. NeuroRx Research
  29. Neurotrack Technologies
  30. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  31. Pfizer Inc.
  32. Piramal Imaging
  33. Servier
  34. Takeda Pharmaceutical Company
  35. Transition Therapeutics
  36. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Predicting clinical course of cognitive decline can boost clinical trials' power and improve our clinical decision-making. Machine learning (ML) algorithms are specifically designed for the purpose of prediction; however. identifying optimal features or algorithms is still a challenge. Objective: To investigate the accuracy of different ML methods and different features to classify cognitively normal (CN) individuals from Alzheimer's disease (AD) and to predict longitudinal outcome in participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Methods: A total of 1,329 participants from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were included: 424 CN, 656 MCI, and 249 AD individuals. Four feature-sets at baseline (hippocampal volume and volume of 47 cortical and subcortical regions with and without demographics and APOE4) and six machine learning methods (decision trees, support vector machines, K-nearest neighbor, ensemble linear discriminant, boosted trees, and random forests) were used to classify participants with normal cognition from participants with AD. Subsequently the model with best classification performance was used for predicting clinical outcome of MCI participants. Results: Ensemble linear discriminant models using demographics and all volumetric magnetic resonance imaging measures as feature-set showed the best performance in classification of CN versus AD participants (accuracy = 92.8%, sensitivity = 95.8%, and specificity = 88.3%). Prediction accuracy of future conversion from MCI to AD for this ensemble linear discriminant at 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 63.8% (sensitivity = 74.4, specificity = 63.1), 68.9% (sensitivity = 75.9, specificity = 67.8), 74.9% (sensitivity = 71.5, specificity = 76.3), 75.3%, (sensitivity = 65.2, specificity = 79.7), and 77.0% (sensitivity = 59.6, specificity = 86.1), respectively. Conclusions: Machine learning models trained for classification of CN versus AD can improve our prediction ability of MCI conversion to AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据