4.7 Article

Preparation and performance of carbon dot decorated copper sulphide/carbon nanotubes hybrid composite as supercapacitor electrode materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 817, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.153057

关键词

Copper sulphide; Carbon dot; 3D grape string-like structure; Electrode material

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51672221, 51872231]
  2. Key Industrial Chain Project of Shaanxi Province [2018ZDCXL-GY-08-07]
  3. Seed Foundation of Innovation and Creation for Graduate Students in Northwestern Polytechnical University [ZZ2018006]
  4. National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program [201810699094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, carbon dot decorated copper sulphide/carbon nanotubes (CuS@CD-CNTs) composite with a unique three-dimensional (3D) grape string-like structure was directly prepared via in situ hydrothermal process at the temperature of 180 degrees C for 12 h and applied for supercapacitors. The chemical composition and morphology were systematically tested by XRD, Raman, SEM and TEM characterization techniques. The as-prepared CuS@CD-CNTs composite brings out a novel 3D grape string-like structure, where the CuS spheres are distributed homogeneously with CNTs as a result of the addition of carbon dot. As the active material of pseudocapacitor electrode, the CuS@CD-CNTs composite delivers superior electrochemical properties with a decent specific capacitance of 736.1 F g(-1) at the current density of 1 A g(-1). Also, the CuS@CD-CNTs composite showed exceptional cycling stability, maintaining 92% retention after 5000 charge-discharge cycles. Such superior electrochemical properties owe to the collective contribution of CuS, CD and CNTs and 3D grape string-like architecture. The excellent electrochemical results above suggest that CuS@CD-CNTs composite has promising electrochemical energy storage application in supercapacitors. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据