4.7 Article

Design of an ultra-stable Sb2Se3 anode with excellent Na storage performance

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 810, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151930

关键词

Sodium-ion battery; Inclusion complex; Ultra-stable structure; Capsular carbon shell; Sb2Se3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672165, 51472152, 51702198]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NWPU [SKLSP201636]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592897XB]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi [2018JQ5107]
  5. Graduate Innovation Fund of Shaanxi University of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Owing to the high theoretical capacity, Sb2Se3 has been regarded as one of the best choices for Sodium-ion batteries (SIBs) anode materials. However, Sb2Se3 anode suffers from huge volume change with poor electrode structure stability, resulting in limited cycling and rate performance. Herein, inspired by the formation of inclusion complex an effective strategy for improving unstable molecules in biological fields, we encapsulate Sb2Se3 in capsular carbon shell via a hydrothermal and calcinations process. Furthermore, by adjusting the thickness of the capsule carbon shell, an ultra-stable Sb2Se3 electrode structure is realized. Equipped with this ultra-stable electrode structure, Sb2Se3 anode exhibits high capacity of 475 mA h g(-1) at 2 A g(-1) even after 600 cycles, showing compelling advantage on Na storage performance compared to other reported Sb-based anode materials. The analysis results indicate that the intact capsular carbon shell can effectively remit huge volume change of Sb2Se3, and act like a reaction vessel in which the sodiation/desodiation reaction of Sb(2)Se(3)is carried out regularly. Therefore, this ultrastable electrode provides stable redox reactions, easy charge transfer and fast sodium ion diffusion, resulting in excellent Na storage performance of Sb2Se3 anode. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据