4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of a robust visible-light-driven AgCl/WO3 composite microrod photocatalyst

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 809, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.151844

关键词

WO3 microrods; AgCl; Heterojuction; Dyes degradation; Carriers separation efficiency

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21567008, 21707055]
  2. Guangdong Province Universities and Colleges Pearl River Scholar Funded Scheme (2019)
  3. Program for Innovative Research Team of Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology
  4. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [21425627]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China-SINOPEC Joint fund [U1663220]
  6. Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program [2017BT01C102]
  7. Program of 5511 Talents in Scientific and Technological Innovation of Jiangxi Province [20165BCB18014]
  8. Academic and Technical Leaders of the Main Disciplines in Jiangxi Province [20172BCB22018]
  9. Yangfan Project of Guangdong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of robust AgCl/WO3 composite microrods (0.1-0.2 mu m) with different Ag/W molar ratios (0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25) were synthesized via hydrothermal-calcination process. The obtained samples were characterized by XRD, SEM, TEM, FT-IR, UV-vis DRS, PL, BET, Raman, transient TPRT and EIS. The photocatalytic test for organic dyes degradation showed that AgCl/WO3 microrods possess much higher photocatalytic activities and stability than bare AgCl and WO3. With optimal AgCl/WO3 molar ratio (0.75 similar to 1), 2 similar to 5 times increse in dye decomposition efficiency w(obtained over AgCl/WO3 microrods. The formation of intimate WO3/AgCl heterojuction (interface) largely enhanced the separation efficiency of photogenerated carriers. This investigation suggested that AgCl/WO3 microrods could a promising photocatalyst for environmental remediation. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据