4.7 Article

Treatment of atopic dermatitis with ruxolitinib cream (JAKI/JAK2 inhibitor) or triamcinolone cream

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 145, 期 2, 页码 572-582

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.08.042

关键词

Atopic dermatitis; CCL17; IgE; itch; JAK inhibitor; Janus kinase; ruxolitinib; topical

资金

  1. Incyte Corporation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly pruritic chronic inflammatory skin disorder. Ruxolitinib, a selective inhibitor of Janus kinase 1 and Janus kinase 2, potently suppresses cytokine signaling involved in AD pathogenesis. Objective: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib (RUX) cream in adults with AD. Methods: In this phase 2 study (NCT03011892), 307 adult patients with AD, an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 2 or 3 (mild or moderate), and 3% to 20% affected body surface area were equally randomized for 8 weeks of double-blind treatment to RUX (1.5% twice daily [BID], 1.5% once daily [QD], 0.5% QD, 0.15% QD), vehicle, or triamcinolone cream (0.1% BID for 4 weeks, then vehicle for 4 weeks). Subsequently, patients could apply 1.5% RUX BID for 4 additional weeks of open-label treatment. The primary end point was the comparison between 1.5% RUX cream BID and vehicle in mean percentage change from baseline in Eczema Area and Severity Index at week 4. Results: All RUX regimens demonstrated therapeutic benefit at week 4; 1.5% BID provided the greatest improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (71.6% vs 15.5%; P <.0001) and Investigator's Global Assessment responses (38.0% vs 7.7%; P <.001) versus vehicle. Rapid reductions in the itch numerical rating scale score occurred within 36 hours (1.5% BID vs vehicle, 1.8 vs 0.2; P <.0001) and were sustained through 12 weeks. Patients who transitioned to 1.5% RUX BID improved in all measures. RUX was not associated with clinically significant application-site reactions. Conclusions: RUX cream provided rapid and sustained improvements in AD symptoms and was well tolerated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据