4.7 Article

Phytochemical Profile, Bioactivity, and Prebiotic Potential of Bound Phenolics Released from Rice Bran Dietary Fiber during in Vitro Gastrointestinal Digestion and Colonic Fermentation

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 67, 期 46, 页码 12796-12805

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06477

关键词

rice bran dietary fiber; bound phenolics; in vitro digestion; colonic fermentation; prebiotic effect

资金

  1. National Key Research Project of China [2017YFD0400205-03, 2018YFD0401101-03]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871798, 31972082]
  3. Group Program of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030312001]
  4. Guangzhou Municipal Major Project of Science and Technology [201804020064]
  5. Guangdong Provincial Special Fund for Modern Agriculture Industry Technology Innovation Teams [2019KJ117]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole-grain dietary fiber is rich in bound-form phenolics, and the biological activity of this special structural feature has attracted increasing attention. In this study, rice bran dietary fiber (RBDF) was subjected to in vitro gastrointestinal digestion and colonic fermentation to investigate the liberation of bound phenolics and their potential activities. Bound phenolics were released at a higher ratio during colonic fermentation (27.57%) than gastrointestinal digestion (2.68%). Nine phenolic compounds were detected from the fermentation supernatants. The released phenolics showed radical scavenging activity (DPPH and ABTS assays) and alpha-glucosidase inhibitory activity (IC50 = 19.11 mu g GAE/mL). Compared with phenolics-removed RBDF (PR-RBDF), RBDF had a significantly stronger prebiotic effect on the microbes associated with diabetes (Lactobacillus spp., Akkermansia muciniphila, and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii). These findings indicate that bound phenolics may act as important functional components that could contribute to the health benefits of whole-grain dietary fiber.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据