4.7 Article

Methionine and Its Hydroxyl Analogues Improve Stem Cell Activity To Eliminate Deoxynivalenol-Induced Intestinal Injury by Reactivating Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 67, 期 41, 页码 11464-11473

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04442

关键词

deoxynivalenol; methionine; methionine hydroxyl analogues; intestinal stem cells; Wnt/beta-catenin signaling

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31872389]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0500501]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou, China [201807010001]
  4. Guangdong Key Areas Research and Development Project [2019B020218001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The intestinal epithelium is derived from intestinal stem cells (ISCs) and has direct contact with nutrients and toxins. However, whether methionine (Met) or a methionine hydroxyl analogue (2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid (HMB)) can alleviate deoxynivalenol (DON)-induced intestinal injury remains unknown. Mice were treated orally with Met or HMB on days 1-11 and with DON on days 4-8. On day 12, the mice were sacrificed, and the jejunum was collected for crypt isolation and culture. Mouse enteroids were treated with DON and Met or HMB ex vivo. The results showed that Met and HMB increased the average daily feed intake and average daily gain of the mice. Met and HMB also improved the jejunal structure and barrier integrity and promoted ISC expansion, as indicated by the increased enteroid formation efficiency and area, under DON-induced injury conditions. In addition, DON-induced decreases in ISC activity were rescued Wnt/beta-catenin signaling reactivation by Met or HMB in vivo and ex vivo. Collectively, our findings reveal that Met and HMB alleviated DON-induced intestinal injury by improving ISC expansion and reactivating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Our study thus provides a nutritional intervention for intestinal diseases involving Wnt/beta-catenin signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据