4.7 Article

Characterization of Novel Protein Component as Marker for Floral Origin of Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) Honey

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 67, 期 44, 页码 12255-12263

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b05190

关键词

jujube honey (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.); botanical origin; protein marker; SDS-PAGE; LC-MS/MS; heat stability

资金

  1. Shaanxi Key RD Program [2018NY-155]
  2. Xi'an Science Program [2017085CG/RC048(XBDX003)]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871876]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) honey, one of the most valuable honey varieties from China with unique characteristics, is vulnerable to being the target of adulteration and deliberate mislabeling of botanical origin. This study investigated the typical protein component of jujube honey to authenticate the floral source by SDS-PAGE analysis combined with LC-MS/MS identification, and its stability to heating was also evaluated. One band and two adjacent but independent bands, both with molecular weights of similar to 19 kDa, were notably observed in Coomassie brilliant blue- and silver-stained SDS-PAGE gels, respectively, for jujube honey from different geographic origins, whereas that was not present for the other five botanical honey varieties, suggesting this protein component was suitable as a marker for jujube honey. LC-MS/MS identification revealed that it was constituted by one Z. jujuba-derived protein (gene number:Zj.jz016003045) and two A. mellifera-derived proteins (an uncharacterized protein with accession number trlA0A088AC16 and a cleavage fragment from major royal jelly protein-1), and the existence of plant-derived protein was attributed to the special neutral pH of jujube honey. Additionally, these protein markers exhibited good stability to heating below 85 degrees C/30 min. This study provided a simple method to characterize jujube honey and first identified a protein indicator to determine the botanical origin of honey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据