4.7 Article

Natural Variation of Glucosinolates and Their Breakdown Products in Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) Seeds

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 67, 期 45, 页码 12528-12537

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b06533

关键词

broccoli; glucosinolate; sulforaphane; isothiocyanate; hydrolysis

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFE0114500, 2017YFD0101805]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200230]
  3. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2016C02051-1]
  4. Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Taizhou City [TZ2018015]
  5. Ningbo Science and Technology Program [2015C110008]
  6. ZAAS (Al)
  7. European Union [774244]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seeds of 32 pure lines and 6 commercial broccoli cultivars were used to investigate variation in glucosinolates and their breakdown products. The aliphatic glucosinolate content was 54.5-218.7 mu mol/g fresh weight, accounting for >90% of the total glucosinolates. The major glucosinolates found were glucoraphanin and glucoerucin in 27 samples and progoitrin in 7 samples. A gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) method was used to identify glucosinolate breakdown products; nine products were directly determined using standards. Using Arabidopsis thaliana lines myb28myb29 and Landsberg erecta to hydrolyze each reference glucosinolate, seven products were tentatively identified. 4-(Methylsulfinyl)butyl isothiocyanate and 5-(methylsulfinyl)pentanenitrile contents were 2.6-91.1 mu mol/g fresh weight and 0-35.4 mu mol/g fresh weight, respectively, with epithionitriles being more common than nitriles in accessions rich in alkenyl glucosinolate. Additionally, (S)-5-vinyl-1,3-oxazolidine-2-thione was detected in accessions rich in progoitrin. Specific lines with altered glucosinolate profiles and breakdown products were obtained and discussed according to the putative glucosinolate metabolism pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据