4.2 Article

Stratigraphy, mineralogy and geochemistry of the Upper Laetolil tuffs including a new tuff 7 site with footprints of Australopithecus afarensis, Laetoli, Tanzania

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES
卷 158, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2019.103561

关键词

Melilite; Tuff; Nephelinite; Australopithecus afarensis; Laetoli

资金

  1. Peter Rich Architects -GMP Consulting Engineers -Laetoli JV (Arusha)
  2. St. Petersburg State University [0.42.955.2016, 3.42.740.2017]
  3. Ngorongoro Conservation Area Authorities (Tanzania)
  4. Fulbright program (USA)
  5. Russian State assignment framework [IGM SB RAS 0330-2016-0005]
  6. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [18-05-00835]
  7. NSF [BCS-0309513]
  8. Natural History Museum (London)
  9. St. Petersburg State University (Resource Centres of X-ray Diffraction Studies and Geo-Environmental Research and Modelling) [3.20.1855.2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Upper Laetolil marker Tuffs 1 to 8 are mineralogically similar rocks, but heterogeneous in terms of their texture, structure, proportion of primary minerals, volume of cement and degree of low-temperature alteration. Originally they were deposited as crystal and/or vitric ash of evolved melilite-nephelinitic composition and not as melilitite-(natro)carbonatite. Occurrence of carbonate-silicate melt inclusions in primary minerals supports R. Hay's conclusion that the ash could have erupted from a carbonatitic volcanic source. Primary minerals (melilite, clinopyroxene, garnet, perovskite, magnetite) in the tuffs are characterised by wide variations in their compositions and two and even more mineral populations are present within each marker tuff. Thus, any correlation between the tuffs from different localities on the basis of mineral composition is very difficult to impossible. Tuff 7, with footprints of Australopithecus afarensis, is a very heterogeneous unit both vertically and laterally that formed during four major eruption events. Trace-element geochemistry and Sr-Nd isotopic data for Tuffs 6, 7 and 8 suggest that compositionally different volcanic sources were involved in their formation. Initial Sr-87/Sr-86 and Nd-144/Nd-143 ratios also show that the Sadiman volcano should not be considered as a source for these three marker tuffs at Laetoli. Only Essimingor and Mosonik volcanoes produced rocks that are mineralogically and geochemically similar to the Upper Laetolil marker tuffs, though these volcanoes lie about 100 km from Laetoli.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据