4.7 Article

Personalized prediction of smartphone-based psychotherapeutic micro-intervention success using machine learning

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 264, 期 -, 页码 430-437

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.071

关键词

Binary classification; Ecological momentary intervention; Internet- and mobile-based intervention; Mental disorder; Mhealth; Supervised learning

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) within the Global Research Network Program [2013S1A2A2035364]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) [PZ00P1_137023]
  3. NRF grant, Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT) of Korea [NRF-2016M3C7A1914450]
  4. National Research Council of Science & Technology (NST) grant by the Korea government (MSIT) [CAP-18-01-KIST]
  5. Stanley Thomas Johnson Stiftung & Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung [PC_28/17, PC_05/18]
  6. International Psychoanalytic University (IPU) Berlin
  7. Gesundheitsforderung Schweiz [18.191]
  8. SNSF [1000014_135328]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Tailoring healthcare to patients' individual needs is a central goal of precision medicine. Combining smartphone-based interventions with machine learning approaches may help attaining this goal. The aim of our study was to explore the predictability of the success of smartphone-based psychotherapeutic micro-interventions in eliciting mood changes using machine learning. Methods: Participants conducted daily smartphone-based psychotherapeutic micro-interventions, guided by short video clips, for 13 consecutive days. Participants chose one of four intervention techniques used in psychotherapeutic approaches. Mood changes were assessed using the Multidimensional Mood State Questionnaire. Micro-intervention success was predicted using random forest (RF) tree-based mixed-effects logistic regression models. Data from 27 participants were used, totaling 324 micro-interventions, randomly split 100 times into training and test samples, using within-subject and between-subject sampling. Results: Mood improved from pre- to post-intervention in 137 sessions (initial success-rate: 42.3%). The RF approach resulted in predictions of micro-intervention success significantly better than the initial success-rate within and between subjects (positive predictive value: 0.732 (95%-CI: 0.607; 0.820) and 0.698 (95%-CI: 0.564; 0.805), respectively). Prediction quality was highest using the RF approach within subjects (rand accuracy: 0.75 (95%-CI: 0.641; 0.840), Matthew's correlation coefficient: 0.483 (95%-CI: 0.323; 0.723)). Limitations: The RF approach does not allow firm conclusions about the exact contribution of each factor to the algorithm's predictions. We included a limited number of predictors and did not compare whether predictability differed between psychotherapeutic techniques. Conclusions: Our findings may pave the way for translation and encourage scrutinizing personalized prediction in the psychotherapeutic context to improve treatment efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据