4.7 Article

Relation between functional and cognitive impairments in remitted patients with bipolar disorder and suggestions for trials targeting cognition: An exploratory study

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 257, 期 -, 页码 382-389

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.030

关键词

Cognition; Functional capacity; Bipolar disorder; Cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation [R21520154121, R215-2015-4121]
  2. Mental Health Services, Capital Region of Denmark
  3. Danish Council for Independent Research, Medical Sciences [DFF-4183-00570]
  4. Weimans Fund
  5. Markedsmodningsfonden (the Market Development Fund) [2015-310]
  6. Gangstedfonden [A29594]
  7. Helsefonden [16-B-0063]
  8. Innovation Fund Denmark (the Innovation Fund, Denmark) [5164-00001B]
  9. Copenhagen Center for Health Technology (CACHET)
  10. EU H2020 ITN (EU project) [722 561]
  11. Augustinusfonden [16-0083]
  12. Ivan Nielsens Fond for Personer med Specielle Sindslidelser [07018014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Trials targeting cognition in bipolar disorder (BD) are advised to include a measure of functional capacity as key secondary or co-primary outcome to assess whether treatment efficacy on cognition translates into enhanced functional capacity. However, it is unclear which measure of functional capacity shows the strongest association with objectively-measured cognition and may thus be best suited for inclusion in cognition trials. Methods: Participants (N = 58) with BD in partial or full remission with objective cognitive impairment and healthy controls (N = 37) were assessed with mood ratings and were given a comprehensive battery of neuropsychological tests and a questionnaire assessing subjective cognitive function, respectively. They were also assessed with performance-based, interview-based and self-reported measures of functional capacity. Associations between objective and subjective cognition and measures of functional capacity were assessed with correlation analyses. For significant correlations, multiple regression analyses were conducted to assess if the associations remained significant after adjustment for clinical and demographic variables. Results: Objectively-measured cognition was directly associated with performance-based functional capacity (beta = 0.37, p < 0.01) also after adjustment for clinical and demographic variables, but not with self-reported or interview-based functional capacity (ps >= 0 .20). In contrast, subjective cognitive complaints were associated with self-reported (beta = 0.59, p < 0.01) and interview-based functional capacity (beta = 0.47, p < 0.01), but not performance-based functional capacity (ps >= 0.28). Limitations: The cross-sectional design and modest sample size. Conclusions: A performance-based measure of functional capacity seems most feasible for inclusion as a secondary outcome in cognition trials to capture improved functional capacity following treatment-related improvements in cognition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据