4.8 Article

Spatial and temporal axes impact ecology of the gut microbiome in juvenile European lobster (Homarus gammarus)

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 531-543

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-019-0546-1

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cefas-Exeter University Alliance PhD Studentship
  2. Agri-Tech Catalyst, Industrial Stage Awards, Lobster Grower 2 project - Innovate UK [102531]
  3. BBSRC [BB/N013891/1]
  4. National Lobster Hatchery (Padstow, UK)
  5. BBSRC [BB/N013891/1, BB/K003240/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/M008924/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial communities within the gut can markedly impact host health and fitness. To what extent environmental influences affect the differential distribution of these microbial populations may therefore significantly impact the successful farming of the host. Using a sea-based container culture (SBCC) system for the on-growing of European lobster (Homarus gammarus), we tracked the bacterial gut microbiota over a 1-year period. We compared these communities with lobsters of the same cohort, retained in a land-based culture (LBC) system to assess the effects of the culture environment on gut bacterial assemblage and describe the phylogenetic structure of the microbiota to compare deterministic and stochastic assembly across both environments. Bacterial gut communities from SBCCs were generally more phylogenetically clustered, and therefore deterministically assembled, compared to those reared in land-based systems. Lobsters in SBCCs displayed significantly more species-rich and species-diverse gut microbiota compared to those retained in LBC. A reduction in the bacterial diversity of the gut was also associated with higher infection prevalence of the enteric viral pathogen Homarus gammarus nudivirus (HgNV). SBCCs may therefore benefit the overall health of the host by promoting the assembly of a more diverse gut bacterial community and reducing the susceptibility to disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据