4.5 Review

Beyond Born-Oppenheimer theory for spectroscopic and scattering processes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL REVIEWS IN PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 38, 期 3-4, 页码 287-341

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144235X.2019.1672987

关键词

Adiabatic potential energy surfaces; nonadiabatic coupling terms; extended Born?Oppenheimer equation; adiabatic-to-diabatic transformation; diabatic Hamiltonian; nonadiabatic dynamics

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India [09/080(0960)/2014-EMR-I, 09/080(1068)/2018-EMR-I, SPM-07/080(0250)/2016-EMR-I]
  2. IACS
  3. Science and Engineering Research Board (DST), India [EMR/2015/001314]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We review our development on beyond Born?Oppenheimer (BBO) theory and its implementation on various models and realistic molecular processes as carried out over the last 15 years. The theoretical formulation leading to the BBO equations are thoroughly discussed with ab initio calculations. We have employed first principle based BBO theory not only to formulate single surface extended Born?Oppenheimer equation to understand the nature of nonadiabatic effect but also to construct accurate diabatic potential energy surfaces (PESs) for important spectroscopic systems, namely, NO radical, Na and K clusters, NO radical, benzene and 1,3,5-trifluorobenzene radical cations ( and ) as well as triatomic reactive scattering systems like and . The nonadiabatic phenomena like Jahn?Teller (JT), Renner?Teller, pseudo Jahn?Teller effects and the accidental conical intersections are the key players in dictating spectroscopic and reactive scattering profiles. The nature of diabatic coupling elements derived from ab initio data with BBO theory for molecular processes in Franck-Condon region has been analysed in the context of linearly and bilinearly coupled JT model Hamiltonian. The results obtained from quantum dynamical calculations on BBO based diabatic PESs of the above molecular systems are found to be in accord with available experimental outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据