4.7 Article

Effects of ambient pressure on smoke movement and temperature distribution in inclined tunnel fires

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.106006

关键词

Inclined tunnel fires; Ambient pressure; Smoke movement; Temperature distribution; Stack effect; Maximum smoke excess temperature

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51722605, 51706219]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WK2320000038]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Anhui Province [201904a07020059]
  4. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS [2015386]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of simulations with regard to inclined road tunnel were conducted to investigate the effect of ambient pressure on smoke movement and temperature distribution. The tunnel slope and ambient pressure were systematically changed. When a fire breaks out in an inclined tunnel, the thermal buoyancy induced by smoke temperature difference will induce an airflow through the tunnel due to the stack effect. The induced longitudinal airflow is a key factor in inclined tunnel fires. Under the combined effect of induced longitudinal airflow and ambient pressure, the smoke movement and temperature distribution pattern are presented firstly. Then the variation of induced longitudinal airflow velocity with tunnel slope and ambient pressure is explained. Finally, taking the tunnel slope, the ambient pressure and the velocity of resulted induced longitudinal airflow into account, a correlation predicting the maximum smoke excess temperature beneath the ceiling is proposed. Moreover, the correlation agrees well with previous experimental results at normal pressure. The results can provide an engineering reference for tunnel structural fire protection, smoke control and safe evacuation in inclined tunnels at different ambient pressures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据