4.6 Article

Variational multi-scale finite element method for the two-phase flow of polymer melt filling process

出版社

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/HFF-07-2019-0599

关键词

Finite element method; Level set; Free surface; Polymer melt filling; Two-phase flow; Variational principle; ASGS-VMS

资金

  1. Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [11702206]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan of Shaanxi Province, China [2018JQ1043]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to develop an effective numerical algorithm for a gas-melt two-phase flow and use it to simulate a polymer melt filling process. Moreover, the suggested algorithm can deal with the moving interface and discontinuities of unknowns across the interface. Design/methodology/approach The algebraic sub-grid scales-variational multi-scale (ASGS-VMS) finite element method is used to solve the polymer melt filling process. Meanwhile, the time is discretized using the Crank-Nicolson-based split fractional step algorithm to reduce the computational time. The improved level set method is used to capture the melt front interface, and the related equations are discretized by the second-order Taylor-Galerkin scheme in space and the third-order total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta scheme in time. Findings The numerical method is validated by the benchmark problem. Moreover, the viscoelastic polymer melt filling process is investigated in a rectangular cavity. The front interface, pressure field and flow-induced stresses of polymer melt during the filling process are predicted. Overall, this paper presents a VMS method for polymer injection molding. The present numerical method is extremely suitable for two free surface problems. Originality/value For the first time ever, the ASGS-VMS finite element method is performed for the two-phase flow of polymer melt filling process, and an effective numerical method is designed to catch the moving surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据