4.7 Review

Mouse Models of Human Claudin-Associated Disorders: Benefits and Limitations

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20215504

关键词

tight junction; claudin; mutations; kidney; liver; skin; human; mice; disease

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Research Training Group GRK 2318
  2. Open Access Publication Fund of the Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin
  3. Ministerio Espanol de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN) [BFU2010-17857, BFU2016-77408-R]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO/FEDER, UE) [BES-2017-080435, BES-2014-068464]
  5. MICINN CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010 Program [CSD2008-00005, BFU2015-70067-REDC]
  6. MINECO [SEV-2016-0644]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In higher organisms, epithelia separate compartments in order to guarantee their proper function. Such structures are able to seal but also to allow substances to pass. Within the paracellular pathway, a supramolecular structure, the tight junction transport is largely controlled by the temporospatial regulation of its major protein family called claudins. Besides the fact that the expression of claudins has been identified in different forms of human diseases like cancer, clearly defined mutations in the corresponding claudin genes have been shown to cause distinct human disorders. Such disorders comprise the skin and its adjacent structures, liver, kidney, the inner ear, and the eye. From the phenotype analysis, it has also become clear that different claudins can cause a complex phenotype when expressed in different organs. To gain deeper insights into the physiology and pathophysiology of claudin-associated disorders, several mouse models have been generated. In order to model human disorders in detail, they have been designed either as full knockouts, knock-downs or knock-ins by a variety of techniques. Here, we review human disorders caused by CLDN mutations and their corresponding mouse models that have been generated thus far and assess their usefulness as a model for the corresponding human disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据