4.7 Article

The Modulating Effect of p-Coumaric Acid on The Surface Charge Density of Human Glioblastoma Cell Membranes

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms20215286

关键词

p-coumaric acid; surface charge density; microelectrophoretic mobility measurements; glioblastoma cells

资金

  1. National Science Centre-Poland [GR-912]
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education under Faculty of Biology and Chemistry, University of Bialystok [8636/E-342/F/2018]
  3. European Funds for Regional Development
  4. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [POPW.01.03.00-20-044/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

p-Coumaric acid (p-CoA), a phenolic acid belonging to the hydroxycinnamic acids family, is a compound with tentative anticancer potential. Microelectrophoretic mobility measurements conducted at various pH values of electrolyte solution were applied to study p-CoA effects on electrical properties of human glioblastoma cell membranes. The obtained results demonstrated that after the p-CoA treatment, the surface charge density of cancer cells changed in alkaline pH solutions, while no noticeable changes were observed in cell membranes incubated with p-CoA compared to control at acidic pH solutions. A four-equilibrium model was used to describe the phenomena occurring on the cell membrane surface. The total surface concentrations of both acidic and basic functional groups and their association constants with solution ions were calculated and used to define theoretical curves of membrane surface charge density versus pH. The resulting theoretical curves and the experimental data were compared to verify the reliability and validity of the adopted model. The deviation of both kinds of data obtained at a higher pH may be caused by disregarding interactions between the functional groups of cancer cells. Processes occurring in the cell membranes after their incubation with p-CoA can lead to disorders of existing equilibria, which result in changes in values of the parameters describing these equilibria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据