4.7 Article

Experimental study on transient thermal characteristics of stagger-arranged lithium-ion battery pack with air cooling strategy

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.118576

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; Heat generation behaviors; Transient thermal characteristics; Longitudinal airflow

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676150]
  2. Key Science Research Innovation Team Project of Shaanxi Province [2016KCT-16]
  3. National Key Research & Development Program of China [2016YFC0802405]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermal characteristics of lithium-ion battery affect significantly charging/discharging performance, cycle life and safety of electric vehicles (EVs) battery packs. In this study, a stagger-arranged battery pack consisting of three battery modules was developed to explore its transient thermal characteristics in charging/discharging process under the two cooling strategies, i.e., natural cooling and forced air cooling. The investigation of heat generation behavior of the battery with Li(NixCoyAl2)O-2 cathode showed that the heat generation rate of the battery remains almost unchanged along the main discharging process, while a rapid increase in heat production is detected at the end of discharging. It was found that the maximum temperature and temperature difference in the battery pack subject to a moderate charging/discharging rate, e.g., 0.5 C, can be maintained within the desirable ranges by natural cooling. The forced air cooling strategy employing longitudinal airflow remarkably improves the battery's transient thermal characteristics with achieving the depth of discharge (DOD) up to 84.2%, which is capable to prolong the battery pack's cycle life to a large extent. Lastly, the appropriate air supply velocity of 0.8 m.s(-1) is recommended for the proposed battery pack subject to a higher discharging rate, e.g., 1 C, from the viewpoint of cooling effectiveness. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据