4.3 Article

Numerical and experimental investigation on mechanical responses of plain woven CFRP composite under various loading cases

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CRASHWORTHINESS
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 65-76

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2019.1687153

关键词

Continuum damage mechanic model; polymer-matrix composites; finite element analysis; crush simulation

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFB0101606]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the mechanical behavior of woven carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites using a continuum damage mechanic model and successfully validated the model through simulations of various loading cases. The research found that simulation results were sensitive to material properties and model-specific parameters, which were carefully investigated and determined to accurately predict the impact responses of woven composites.
This paper studies the complex mechanical behaviour of woven carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites fabricated by Vacuum Assisted Resin Infusion technique. A strategy for modelling of woven composite using a continuum damage mechanic model is proposed in this research. Then different loading cases, including off-angle tension, punch and axial crushing of corrugated plate, were simulated and the numerical results correlate very well with experiments in terms of mechanical responses, which verifies the validity of the modelling strategy. However, it is found that simulation is greatly affected by some parameters including both material properties and model-specific parameters, such as potential fracture angle in the transverse direction, crush front softening parameter, contact penetration curve and thickness of crush trigger. All these parameters are determined and investigated in detail. Results show that impact responses of woven composites, including both in-plane and out-of-plane direction, can be predicted with enough accuracy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据