4.7 Article

Atomic force microscopy reveals how relative humidity impacts the Young's modulus of lignocellulosic polymers and their adhesion with cellulose nanocrystals at the nanoscale

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.10.074

关键词

Cellulose; Hemicellulose; lignin; Oxidation; Adhesion; Young's modulus

资金

  1. Grand Est Region
  2. European FEDER Program within COFILI project [D201550245]
  3. ANR INTOS2 [ANR-18-CE93-0007]
  4. DDRT Grand Est
  5. European FEDER program
  6. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-18-CE93-0007] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic biomass is receiving growing interest as a renewable source of biofuels, chemicals and materials. Lignocellulosic polymers and cellulose nanocrystals (CNCs) present high added-value potential in the nanocomposite field, but some issues have to be solved before large-scale applications. Among them, the interaction between polymers at the nanoscale and the effect of the external parameters on the mechanical properties have to be more precisely investigated. The present study aims at evaluating how the relative humidity affects the reduced Young's modulus of lignocellulosic films prepared with crystalline cellulose, glucomannan, xylan and lignin and how relative humidity changes their nanoscale adhesion properties with CNCs. Using atomic force microscopy and force volume experiments with CNC-functionalized levers, increasing the relative humidity is shown to decrease the Young's modulus values of the different films and promote their adhesion forces with CNCs. In particular, CNCs more strongly interact with glucomannan and lignin than xylan, and in the case of lignin, the oxidation of the film promotes strong variations in the adhesion force. Such results allow to better understand the lignocellulosic film properties at the nanoscale, which should lead to an improvement in the production of new highly added-value composites. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据