4.7 Article

Relationship between protein structure changes and in vitro digestion of preserved egg white during pickling

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.057

关键词

Preserved egg white; Pickling; Protein structure; In vitro digestion; Peptide

资金

  1. Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31760439, 31871832]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Jiangxi Province [20171BBF60038]
  3. Young Scientist Training Objects Program of Jiangxi Province [20153BCB23028]
  4. Jiangxi Province Outstanding Youth Talent Funded Projects [20162BCB23031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the relationship between protein structure changes and in vitro digestion of preserved egg white (PEW) during pickling was studied. Results showed that as the pickling time increased, moisture content of PEW exhibited a decreasing trend, pH value and hardness of PEW exhibited an increasing trend. Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM) revealed that alkali-treated duck egg white could form a more compact gel network structure during pickling. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) showed that PEW consisted of two sorts of structures, namely fibrillar (from 7th to 21st day) and particulate (from 28th to 42nd day). Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy showed that there was an increase in the content of beta-sheets and a decrease in the content of alpha-helices during pickling. Protein digestibility of PEW was highest at day 14 and the lowest at day 42. Moreover, the content of beta-sheets was negatively correlated with protein digestibility. Peptides identification using LC-MS/MS highlighted that the number of different peptides were positively correlated with the pickling. The number of unique peptides was negatively correlated with protein digestibility at the end of gastric and intestinal digestion. This study would provide guidance for studying nutritional value and controlling quality of preserved eggs. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据