4.5 Article

Analysis of intestinal immunity and flora in a collagen-induced mouse arthritis model: differences during arthritis progression

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 49-56

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxz058

关键词

collagen-induced arthritis; gut microbiota; T cell; time course analysis

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [18K16644]
  2. Yamagata Health Support Association (2016-18)
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [18K16644] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intestinal immunity and flora are reported to be associated with the onset of rheumatoid arthritis. However, differences in the intestinal immunity and flora dynamics between the initial peak and relapse of arthritis have not been investigated. Here we analyzed the lymphocyte populations in different lymphoid tissues, the IgA in feces, and the intestinal flora at the initial peak and the relapse phase of arthritis in a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model. In this model compared with the control group, the percentage of ROR gamma t(+)CD4(+) T cells in the mesenteric lymph nodes (mLN) was increased at the initial peak but decreased at the relapse stage of arthritis, and the opposite changes were observed in the spleen. The percentage of Foxp3(+)CD4(+) T cells was unchanged at the initial peak in both tissues but increased only in the mLN at the relapse stage. The IgA in feces increased with the progression of arthritis, and bacterial analysis revealed that some specific bacterial families were changed at the peak and relapse stages of arthritis. Finally, the immune dynamics under different arthritic conditions were examined by integrating these factors using principal component analysis (PCA). PCA showed that the immunological and intestinal flora profiles were different between the initial peak and the relapse of the arthritis. Our findings suggest that the intestinal immunity and the environment change drastically with the progress of arthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据