4.7 Article

Hyper-Laplacian regularized nonlocal low-rank matrix recovery for hyperspectral image compressive sensing reconstruction

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 501, 期 -, 页码 406-420

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.012

关键词

Hyperspectral image; Compressive sensing reconstruction; Low-rank matrix recovery; Hyper-Laplacian; Non-local self-similarity; Structured sparsity; Alternative direction multiplier method

资金

  1. Science, Technology and Innovation Commission of Shenzhen Manicipality [JCYJ20170815162956949]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61771391, 61371152]
  3. innovation Foundation for Doctor Dissertation of Northwestern Polytechnical University [CX201917]
  4. Fund for Scientific Research in Flanders (FWO) project [G037115N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sparsity prior is a powerful tool for compressive sensing reconstruction (CSR) of hyper-spectral image (HSI). However, conventional HSI-CSR strategies are not tuned to extracting refine spatial and spectral sparsity prior. Moreover, these CSR techniques are weak in preserving edges and suppressing artifacts. To alleviate these issues, this paper represents a first effort to characterize the spatial and spectral knowledge using the structure-based sparsity prior. Specifically, we introduce the nonlocal low-rank matrix recovery model and the hyper-Laplacian prior to encode the spatial and spectral structured sparsity, respectively. The key advantage of the proposed method, termed as hyper-Laplacian regularized nonlocal low-rank matrix recovery (HyNLRMR), is to adopt insightful property, namely the nonlocal self-similarity across the spatial domain and the consistency along the spectral domain. Then, the alternative direction multiplier method (ADMM) is designed to effectively implement the proposed algorithm. Experimental results on various HSI datasets verify that the proposed algorithm can significantly outperform existing state-of-the-art HSI-CSR methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据