4.1 Article

Genome-Wide Analysis of Putative G-Quadruplex Sequences (PGQSs) in Onion Yellows Phytoplasma (Strain OY-M): An Emerging Plant Pathogenic Bacteria

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY
卷 59, 期 4, 页码 468-475

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12088-019-00831-z

关键词

Phytoplasma; G-Quadruplexes; Genic regions; Regulatory regions; Repeat-rich regions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytoplasma, an emerging plant pathogen is an endocellular obligate parasite of plant phloem tissues with highly reduced genomes and low GC content. They contain a minimal set of genes essential for survival as an intracellular parasite. The role of G-Quadruplexes in pathogenicity has been reported in a variety of microbial pathogens. Detailed investigation on the genome wide occurrence and distribution of Putative G-Quadruplex forming Sequences (PGQSs) in the AT-rich genome of Onion yellows phytoplasma (strain OY-M) was carried out. Relative enrichment and depletion of these putative secondary structures in different genomic regions of OY-M was investigated with an aim to unravel their association with functionally important genomic locations. PGQSs density of 0.4407/Kbp was detected in the genome of OY-M phytoplasma, which is significantly higher than the average PGQSs density (0.136/Kbp) reported for other members of its phylum, namely Tenericutes. A non-random distribution of PGQSs across the length of the genome was observed. Putative promoter regions of OY-M were found to be particularly enriched in PGQSs followed by genic regions. The repeat rich regions were identified to have minimum PGQSs density. Presence of PGQSs in important genes such as those involved in secretory pathways of virulent factors, transport related functions, rRNA and tRNA was particularly intriguing. Our study reports for the first time a detailed investigation on the genome-wide locations of putative G-Quadruplexes in phytoplasma and highlights the need to further investigate their role in the metabolism and also in the mechanism of pathogenicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据