4.7 Article

Generalized Master-Slave-Splitting Method and Application to Transmission-Distribution Coordinated Energy Management

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 5169-5183

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2018.2890169

关键词

Distributed energy resource (DER); distributed optimization; distribution; energy management; transmission

资金

  1. State Grid Corporation Technology Project [SGRIJSKJ(2016)800]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621065]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transmission-distribution coordinated energy management (TDCEM) is recognized as a promising solution to the challenge of high distributed energy resource (DER) penetration, but there is a lack of a distributed computation method that universally and effectively works for the TDCEM. To bridge this gap, this paper presents a generalized master-slave-splitting (G-MSS) method. This method is based on a general-purpose transmission-distribution coordination model called G-TDCM, which enables the G-MSS to be applicable to most of the central functions of the TDCEM. In this G-MSS method, a basic heterogeneous decomposition (HGD) algorithm is first derived from the heterogeneous decomposition of the coupling constraints in the optimality conditions of the G-TDCM. Its optimality and convergence properties are proved. Then, inspired by the sufficient conditions for convergence, a modified HGD algorithm that utilizes the subsystem's response function is developed and demonstrated to converge faster. The distributed G-MSS method is then demonstrated to successfully solve a series of central functions of the TDCEM, e.g., power flow, contingency analysis, voltage stability assessment, economic dispatch, and optimal power flow. The severe issues of over-voltage and erroneous assessment of the system security that are caused by DERs are thus resolved by the G-MSS method with modest computation cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据