4.7 Article

Enhanced Energy Management System With Corrective Transmission Switching Strategy-Part I: Methodology

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS
卷 34, 期 6, 页码 4490-4502

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPWRS.2019.2922880

关键词

Corrective transmission switching; energy management systems; power system reliability; real-time contingency analysis; real-time security-constrained economic dispatch

资金

  1. Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy under the Green Electricity Network Integration program
  2. Department of Energy Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy under the Network Optimized Distributed Energy Systems program
  3. National Science Foundation [1449080]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Division Of Computer and Network Systems [1449080] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flexibility in transmission networks is not fully utilized in existing energy management systems (EMSs). Corrective transmission switching (CTS) is proposed in this two-part paper to enable EMS to take advantage of the flexibility in transmission systems in a practical way. This paper proposes the following two EMS procedures: first, Procedure-A connects real-time security-constrained economic dispatch (RT SCED) with real-time contingency analysis (RTCA), which is consistent with industrial practice; and second, Procedure-B, an enhanced version of Procedure-A, includes CTS in EMS with the proposed concept of branch pseudo limit used in RT SCED. Part-I of this paper presents the methodology, whereas Part-II includes detailed results analysis. It is demonstrated that Procedure-A can effectively eliminate the base case overloads and the potential post-contingency overloads identified by RTCA, and Procedure-B can achieve significant congestion cost reduction with consideration of CTS in RT SCED. Numerical simulations also illustrate that integrating CTS into RT SCED would improve social welfare.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据