4.8 Review

Mesoporous silica nanoparticles with organo-bridged silsesquioxane framework as innovative platforms for bioimaging and therapeutic agent delivery

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 91, 期 -, 页码 90-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.019

关键词

PMOs; Mesoporous nanoparticles; Biocompatible properties; Advanced nanocarriers; Bioimaging; Therapeutic agent delivery

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21501009, 21127007]
  2. High-Level Talent Introduction Plan of University of Science & Technology Beijing [06500017]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [FRF-TP-15-019A1]
  4. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DP130104459, DP140104062]
  5. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mesoporous silica material with organo-bridged silsesquioxane frameworks is a kind of synergistic combination of inorganic silica, mesopores and organics, resulting in some novel or enhanced physicochemical and biocompatible properties compared with conventional mesoporous silica materials with pure Si-O composition. With the rapid development of nanotechnology, monodispersed nanoscale periodic mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles (PMO NPs) and organo-bridged mesoporous silica nano particles (MSNs) with various organic groups and structures have recently been synthesized from 100%, or less, bridged organosilica precursors, respectively. Since then, these materials have been employed as carrier platforms to construct bioimaging and/or therapeutic agent delivery nanosystems for nano biomedical application, and they demonstrate some unique and/or enhanced properties and performances. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the controlled synthesis of PMO NPs and organ-bridged MSNs, physicochemical and biocompatible properties, and their nano-biomedical application as bioimaging agent and/or therapeutic agent delivery system. (c) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据