4.7 Article

Optimal Electric Stimulus Amplitude Improves the Selectivity Between Responses of ON Versus OFF Types of Retinal Ganglion Cells

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2939012

关键词

Retinal prosthesis; bionic eye; electrical stimulation; electrophysiology; retinal ganglion cell

资金

  1. Henry Ford Health System [A30940, A20056]
  2. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) [2E28700, 2E29200, 2E29530, 2V07240, 2V07360, 2V07510]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2E29200, 2E29530] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Outer retinal degenerative diseases destroy photoreceptors primarily in the retina, resulting in a profound vision loss. Fortunately, surviving retinal neurons can be electrically stimulated using retinal prostheses to re-transmit visual information. Although retinal prostheses are promising for sight restoration, the best performance is still sub-optimal. For the enhanced performance, it is critical to optimize stimulation parameters. This study explored how stimulus charge and current amplitude alters responses of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). From the isolated mouse retina, spiking activities of alpha ON, OFF sustained, and OFF transient RGCs were recorded in response to epiretinally-delivered cathodal current pulses ranging from -10 to -80 mu A. We have found that intermediate current amplitudes (-30 and -40 mu A) maximize the response ratio of ON over OFF types. Also, the ON/OFF response ratio was always bigger for 10-ms-long than 5-ms-long stimuli. It was because, by the longer pulses, ON RGC responses were always significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) while OFF RGC responses were minimally changed (p > 0.05). Given the earlier work reporting electrically-elicited responses are more natural in ON than OFF RGCs, the present study suggests effect strategies of more selective activation of ON RGCs for improved efficacy of retinal implant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据