4.8 Review

Cell-based tissue engineering strategies used in the clinical repair of articular cartilage

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 1-22

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.018

关键词

Cartilage tissue engineering; Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Cartilage repair; Scaffolds for cartilage regeneration; Scaffold-free cartilage; Clinical cartilage products

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01AR067821]
  2. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) [TR3-05709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One of the most important issues facing cartilage tissue engineering is the inability to move technologies into the clinic. Despite the multitude of current research in the field, it is known that 90% of new drugs that advance past animal studies fail clinical trials. The objective of this review is to provide readers with an understanding of the scientific details of tissue engineered cartilage products that have demonstrated a certain level of efficacy in humans, so that newer technologies may be developed upon this foundation. Compared to existing treatments, such as microfracture or autologous chondrocyte implantation, a tissue engineered product can potentially provide more consistent clinical results in forming hyaline repair tissue and in filling the entirety of the defect. The various tissue engineering strategies (e.g., cell expansion, scaffold material, media formulations, biomimetic stimuli, etc.) used in forming these products, as collected from published literature, company websites, and relevant patents, are critically discussed. The authors note that many details about these products remain proprietary, not all information is made public, and that advancements to the products are continuously made. Nevertheless, by understanding the design and production processes of these emerging technologies, one can gain tremendous insight into how to best use them and also how to design the next generation of tissue engineered cartilage products. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据