4.8 Article

Red blood cell membrane camouflaged magnetic nanoclusters for imaging-guided photothermal therapy

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 92, 期 -, 页码 13-24

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.026

关键词

Iron oxide nanoparticles; Red blood cells; Photothermal therapy; Nanoclusters; Magnetic resonance imaging

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573006, 81273459, 51273047]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project [2012ZX09304004]
  3. China National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB932500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Along with intrinsic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) advantages, iron oxide nanomaterials capable of photothermal conversion have been reported very recently and have again raised great interest in their designs among biomedical researchers. However, like other inorganic nanomaterials, high macrophage uptake, short blood retention time and unfavorable biodistributions have strongly hampered their applications in vivo. To solve these problems, a rational design of red blood cell (RBC) membrane camouflaged iron oxide magnetic clusters (MNC@RBCs) is presented in this paper. Our data show that by simply introducing an ultra-stealth biomimetic coating to iron oxide magnetic nanoclusters (MNCs), MNC@RBCs maintain the imaging and photothermal functionalities inherited from MNCs cores while achieving much lower nonspecific macrophage uptake and dramatically altered fate in vivo. MNC@RBCs with superior prolonged blood retention time, preferred high tumor accumulation and relatively lowered liver biodistribution are demonstrated when injected intravenously in mice, leading to greatly enhanced photothermal therapeutic efficacy by a single treatment without further magnetic force manipulation. Our study illustrates a well prepared integration of MNCs and RBCs, exploiting advantages of both functionalities within a single unit and suggests a promising future for iron-based nanomaterials application in vivo. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据