4.7 Article

Cascading Failure of Cyber-Coupled Power Systems Considering Interactions Between Attack and Defense

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TCSI.2019.2922371

关键词

Power system faults; Power system protection; Power grids; Malware; Couplings; Cyberattack; Power network; cyber-physical system; cascading failure

资金

  1. Hong Kong Research Grants Council under GRF [PolyU 152096/17E]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we develop a network-based model with consideration of the physical power flow process to study the cascading failure in cyber-coupled power systems. We take the coupling between power and cyber networks as being resulted from the interdependence of power nodes and cyber nodes. Interaction between two processes, one aiming to attack (cause damage) and the other aiming to defend (protect) the components in the power network, is considered in the model. This interaction offers a novel perspective to interpreting the interdependence of power and cyber networks. To study how an attacker or defender deploys resources to attack or protect a power component, four strategies in distributing the attack and defense strengths are considered, namely, even distribution, degree-based distribution, capacity-based distribution, and random distribution. To probe into the actual propagation process of a blackout, we define four critical time points, namely, start time, attack time, isolation time and end time, and use these time points to analyze and evaluate the effectiveness of different attack and defense strategies. The tit-for-tat defense strategy, in which defender adopts the same strategy as the attacker, is found to be the preferred defense strategy under most conditions. Moreover, allocating defense strength in terms of capacity-based distribution can most effectively suppress cascading failure. This finding was not obtainable without due consideration of the physical power flow process in network-based models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据