4.8 Article

Treatment of hind limb ischemia using angiogenic peptide nanofibers

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 98, 期 -, 页码 113-119

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.04.032

关键词

Self-assembly; Therapeutic angiogenesis; Hind-limb ischemia; Multi-domain peptide; Peripheral artery disease

资金

  1. Welch Foundation [C1557]
  2. NIH [R01 DE021798, F32 DE023696]
  3. Direct For Education and Human Resources
  4. Division Of Undergraduate Education [0966303] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For a proangiogenic therapy to be successful, it must promote the development of mature vasculature for rapid reperfusion of ischemic tissue. Whole growth factor, stem cell, and gene therapies have yet to achieve the clinical success needed to become FDA-approved revascularization therapies. Herein, we characterize a biodegradable peptide-based scaffold engineered to mimic VEGF and self-assemble into a nanofibrous, thixotropic hydrogel, SLanc. We found that this injectable hydrogel was rapidly infiltrated by host cells and could be degraded while promoting the generation of neovessels. In mice with induced hind limb ischemia, this synthetic peptide scaffold promoted angiogenesis and ischemic tissue recovery, as shown by Doppler-quantified limb perfusion and a treadmill endurance test. Thirteen-month-old mice showed significant recovery within 7 days of treatment. Biodistribution studies in healthy mice showed that the hydrogel is safe when administered intramuscularly, subcutaneously, or intravenously. These preclinical studies help establish the efficacy of this treatment for peripheral artery disease due to diminished microvascular perfusion, a necessary step before clinical translation. This peptide-based approach eliminates the need for cell transplantation or viral gene transfection (therapies currently being assessed in clinical trials) and could be a more effective regenerative medicine approach to microvascular tissue engineering. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据