4.8 Article

Biofunctionalized PEDOT-coated microfibers for the treatment of spinal cord injury

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 89, 期 -, 页码 98-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.037

关键词

Microfibers; PEDOT; Functionalization; Spinal cord injury; Axonal; Regeneration

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  2. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  3. FEDER [PI12/02835]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PoIy(3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-coated carbon microfibers (PEDOT-MFs) hold promise for developing advanced neuroprostheses and neural repair devices. We investigated the chronic cellular responses to PEDOT-MFs implanted into the uninjured and the transected rat spinal cord, and compared the effects of polymer surface biofunctionalization with covalently attached polylysine (PLL) or a multimolecular complex of PLL, heparin, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and fibronectin. An alginate gel was used to facilitate microfiber implantation and reduce connective tissue scarring after spinal cord injury (SCI). PLL/heparin/bFGF/fibronectin-functionalized PEDOT-MFs showed excellent integration within the uninjured and injured spinal cord, frequently establishing contact with neuronal somas, axons, dendrites and glial cells, accompanied by very little or absent scarring response. On the contrary, non-functionalized and PLL-functionalized microfibers provoked inflammation and fibrosis with loss of neural elements in the surrounding tissue. Within the lesion, the PEDOT-MFs by themselves facilitated longitudinal alignment of migratory cells and growing axons, and their modification with PLL/heparin/bFGF/fibronectin promoted tissue healing, enhancing blood vessel formation and axonal regeneration without increasing inflammation. These results support the incorporation of biofunctionalized electro-conducting microfibers in neuro electronic interfaces and lesion-bridging systems for the treatment of SCI. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据