4.7 Article

Wireless Localization of Spallings in Switch-Rails With Guided Waves Based on a Time-Frequency Method

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 19, 期 23, 页码 11050-11062

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2019.2934159

关键词

Time-frequency analysis; mode conversion; spalling localization; switch-rails

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council
  2. EPSRC [EP/J012343/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Guided waves have been studied for monitoring defects on switch-rails. However, few researchers study monitoring of spallings. Previous studies on switch-rail damage detection are not suitable for this kind of damage at the edge of the rail web. In addition, wired configurations have the challenges of power supply and more cost. This paper proposes a time-frequency analysis based algorithm that is used to locate spallings. The algorithm is verified through an improved wireless based structural health monitoring (SHM) platform. The excitation frequency of 108 kHz is chosen as a compromise between larger wave velocity differences and smaller detectable damage sizes. A total of 4 piezoelectric (PZT) devices make up one actuator-sensor array. 2 PZT devices are placed at 2 sides of the rail web and both of them have the same excitation direction. The other 2 devices are mounted at the top of the rail web to measure spalling induced waves according to the cloud charts. The arrival time, frequency, and wave velocity features of the main modes in transmission and reflection waves are extracted. Then these parameters are substituted in the proposed algorithm to predict the spalling location. Simulation and epoxy bonding based experimental results show that the proposed method can identify a 15 mm length spalling at different locations. Finally, attention is paid to the mode identification errors that influence spalling localization. The effects of curvature on guided waves in switch-rails are analyzed and considered to be the cause of the errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据